Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIRA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SNOW. Bad faith and/or misguided nomination. ‑Scottywong | gab _ 23:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JIRA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy, promotional, non-notable software article. Does not meet our general notability guideline. Almost all sources are the company's website. Promotional gems include: "Starting with JIRA 4, a 10-user starter license costs $10 with all proceeds benefiting Room to Read." Likely created by someone with a COI. Delete. CitizenNeutral (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Very notable software. Rewrite is in order to remove promotional material. Sorry that I don't have time to find secondary sources, but they are highly regarded in the software development community, mot notably in the agile community. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Notable software used in many projects, article needs a rewrite, not deletion -VJ (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This article needs to be rewritten to meet Wikipedia's quality standards, but should not be deleted -Alex Rosenberg (talk) 01:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.